Blog
STAY INFORMED.
SIGN UP FOR OUR NEWSLETTER.
Post Search
The Real Cost of CPSC’s Hidden Law to New Parents
Kara Rollins
Photo: NCLA client Lisa Milice and her baby As I have recently found out, there are many things to worry about as a new or expecting parent. The joy of welcoming a new life into the world can easily be eclipsed by a wide range of concerns. Not to mention, the nearly herculean task of…
Read
Cancel Culture on Trial
Peggy Little
An important case will be heard this term at the Supreme Court out of the Ninth Circuit—and the stakes could not be higher. Americans for Prosperity Foundation v. Becerra challenges a California Office of Attorney General’s lawless demand for non-profits’ donor lists that displays a shocking determination to eviscerate one of the landmark civil rights…
Read
One Mother’s Fight to See the Law
Jared McClain
When mother-to-be Lisa Milice was researching nursery products to buy for her first child, she ran into a paywall. The problem was that, although the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission adopts binding safety standards for infant and nursery products, consumers cannot actually see those standards. CPSC incorporates by reference a standard set by a…
Read
How Executive Branch Can Override Congress’ View of Criminal Law in Court
Caleb Kruckenberg
Let’s try a thought experiment. Imagine a criminal law that says, “It’s a felony to do bad things.” That’s it. That’s the whole law. There’s no further explanation. I have a pretty solid understanding of what I think are “bad things.” I guarantee, however, that some things I consider “bad” would be okay for…
Read
Axon Suffers a Defeat in the 9th Circuit but Both Majority and Dissent See the Problem
John J. Vecchione
We have discussed Axon v. FTC before and followed it closely since its inception. On January 28, 2021, the Ninth Circuit gave us more to consider. First, a recap is in order. Axon Enterprise, Inc. (Axon) is a corporation that makes law enforcement equipment such as tasers and body cameras. The FTC determined to investigate it under…
Read
The Substantial Evidence Standard of Reviewing Administrative Fact-Findings Is Unconstitutional
Adi Dynar
Federal court appellate rules (and most state appellate and high courts) require party briefs to include a “standard of review” section (Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 28(a)(8)(B)). Lawyers tend to pay little, if any, attention to this section. Usually, a single sentence from some random case can be copy-pasted into the brief, saying: questions of…
Read