Blog
STAY INFORMED.
SIGN UP FOR OUR NEWSLETTER.
Post Search
Could Jarkesy Help Resolve Circuit Split on NLRB’s Authority to Impose Monetary Remedies?
Blogs
Judge Bumatay’s dissent in Int’l Union of Operating Eng’rs, Stationary Eng’rs, Loc. 39 v. NLRB, 127 F.4th 58, 79 (9th Cir. 2025), suggests that SEC v. Jarkesy, 603 U.S. 109 (2024)—which held that the SEC’s in-house adjudication of civil-penalty claims violated the accused’s right to a jury trial in an Article III court—may be key…
Read
Our Agencies Are Failing Us: Why A Mother’s Discernment Cannot Be Replaced by Fallible Agencies
Blogs
American citizens should not allow federal agencies to replace their own discernment and instinct by blindly believing that regulations reduce risk—the government will never be a benevolent parens patriae. This overreach is a slippery slope to potential civil liberties violations, undermining the very freedoms that protect individual choice and autonomy. Skepticism of the government is…
Read
FDA’s cynical attempt to shut the courthouse doors — and the threat it poses to our rights against all federal agencies
Blogs
A pending Supreme Court case threatens the right of many citizens’ to challenge agency actions that unlawfully harm them. In Food and Drug Administration v. RJ Reynolds Vapor Co, the Supreme Court will either confirm that right or permit the FDA to shut the courthouse door on many people and businesses harmed by unlawful agency…
Read
I Beg Your Pardon? Victims of Unjust Agency “Civil” Prosecution Deserve Mercy Too
Blogs
The recent flurry of pardons issued by our outgoing and incoming presidents raises a question I’ve pondered from time to time but never resolved: Can (and should) presidents grant clemency to deserving people who committed no crime but nevertheless find themselves condemned to perpetual misery and impecunity for committing putatively “civil” violations prosecuted by federal…
Read
Consent Decrees: Thinning Out the Forest of Laws
Blogs
The Forest of Laws The Department of Justice’s litigators have decided that management of the Minneapolis police department may no longer remain where the law says it must remain. This must be so, they say, because they are on the hunt for policing patterns and practices that allegedly produce racially disparate results. No one wants…
Read
The Two Holdings of Securities and Exchange Commission v. Jarkesy and What They Mean for the Future of Administrative Adjudication
Blogs
Public commentary on the Supreme Court’s decision in SEC v. Jarkesy is an unusually stark litmus test of political and legal perspectives of the commentariat. Progressives sound a drumbeat of conspiracy, destruction, mayhem and even ruin against a lively background of originalists, libertarians, and conservatives shooting off fireworks and cannons or popping champagne to celebrate. …
Read
