Sign Up

NCLA Site Search

Amicus Briefs

Liu v. SEC

It is undisputed that the “disgorgement” remedy appears nowhere in the SEC’s enabling statutes. History reveals that the disgorgement remedy was created and expanded by an strategic enforcement and litigation process allowing SEC to arrogate to itself powers not granted by Congress. This process built on each victory with increasing overreach. What was once deemed “ancillary” relief has expanded, as extra-statutory powers are wont to do, to dwarf the actual relief provided by statute, and to make a mockery of what disgorgement means in equity even if such remedy was provided by statute. This plan was observed and followed by other agencies, particularly the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), and error has flowed from the SEC’s overreach to other parts of the Government. This invasive weed was not nipped in the bud and so must be uprooted in its present exotic bloom.

Mark Chenoweth
President and Chief Legal Officer
John J. Vecchione
Senior Litigation Counsel
NCLA FILINGS

Amicus Curiae Brief of the New Civil Liberties Alliance in Support of Petitioners

December 23, 2019 | Read More

PRESS RELEASES

SCOTUS Urged to End SEC Use of Legal Remedies Not Prescribed by Statute

December 23, 2019 | Read More

RELATED CASES

SHARE THIS CASE

Enter your email address above to be notified whenever we post a new document to this case.