Amicus Briefs
Consumers’ Research; By Two, L.P. v. Consumer Product Safety Commission
CASE SUMMARY
NCLA is particularly disturbed by government officials not answerable to the President who are purportedly authorized by statute to usurp his Article II power to enforce the law. In Consumers’ Research v. Consumer Product Safety Commission, NCLA pointed out that Congress has authorized the Commissioners of CPSC to exercise executive powers, including the power to commence litigation. But CPSC Commissioners may not be removed at will by the President. Because they are not subject to his at-will removal, the Commission may not exercise the executive power.
In April 2024, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied the Plaintiffs’ petition for an en banc rehearing in this case.
OUR TEAM
RELEVANT MATERIALS
NCLA FILINGS
Order of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
April 16, 2024 | Read More
Brief Amicus Curiae of the New Civil Liberties Alliance in Support of Plaintiffs-Appellees and Re-Hearing en Banc
February 13, 2024 | Read More
Order
October 7, 2022 | Read More
Unopposed Motion for Leave to File Brief and Brief Amicus Curiae of the New Civil Liberties Alliance in Support of Plaintiffs-Appellees
October 7, 2022 | Read More