Sign Up

NCLA Site Search

Cases

John C. Ponte v. FDIC

In the past two terms, the Supreme Court of the United States has provided lower courts with binding precedent and agencies with direction requiring that: 1) structural constitutional claims be permitted to be heard in district courts; 2) jury trials, which may only occur in Article III courts, be available for actions at law, including for penalties and damages; and 3) agencies’ interpretations of law not receive deference. Despite this, FDIC has continued to subject John C. Ponte to an endless and unlawful administrative process.

Mark Chenoweth
President and Chief Legal Officer
Kara Rollins
Litigation Counsel
John J. Vecchione
Senior Litigation Counsel
NCLA FILINGS

Memorandum Opinion

October 11, 2024 | Read More

Notice of subsequent actions in the FDIC administrative hearing against plaintiff Ponte, and of subsequent authority

September 26, 2024 | Read More

Plaintiff's Response in Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss the Complaint

September 6, 2024 | Read More

Plaintiff's Reply Memorandum to Defendants' Opposition to His Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order

August 30, 2024 | Read More

Plaintiff's Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Plaintiff's Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order

August 19, 2024 | Read More

PRESS RELEASES

NCLA Seeks to Halt FDIC’s Attempted Illegal Prosecution of Enforcement Target Without Jury Trial

August 19, 2024 | Read More

RELATED CASES

SHARE THIS CASE

Enter your email address above to be notified whenever we post a new document to this case.