Cases
John C. Ponte v. FDIC
CASE SUMMARY
In the past two terms, the Supreme Court of the United States has provided lower courts with binding precedent and agencies with direction requiring that: 1) structural constitutional claims be permitted to be heard in district courts; 2) jury trials, which may only occur in Article III courts, be available for actions at law, including for penalties and damages; and 3) agencies’ interpretations of law not receive deference. Despite this, FDIC has continued to subject John C. Ponte to an endless and unlawful administrative process.
OUR TEAM
RELEVANT MATERIALS
NCLA FILINGS
Memorandum Opinion
October 11, 2024 | Read More
Notice of subsequent actions in the FDIC administrative hearing against plaintiff Ponte, and of subsequent authority
September 26, 2024 | Read More
Plaintiff's Response in Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss the Complaint
September 6, 2024 | Read More
Plaintiff's Reply Memorandum to Defendants' Opposition to His Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order
August 30, 2024 | Read More
Plaintiff's Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Plaintiff's Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order
August 19, 2024 | Read More
PRESS RELEASES
NCLA Seeks to Halt FDIC’s Attempted Illegal Prosecution of Enforcement Target Without Jury Trial
August 19, 2024 | Read More