NCLA Site Search

Cases

Mexican Gulf Fishing Company v. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

Back to Case Finder

CASE: Mexican Gulf Fishing Company, et al. v. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, et al.

STATUS: Closed

NCLA ROLE: Counsel

COURTS HEARD IN: 5th Cir., E.D. La.

ORIGINAL COURT: U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana

DECIDING COURT: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

OPENED: August 20, 2020

FOCUS AREAS:

Due Process Violations

The due process of law guarantees a right to be held to account only through the processes of an impartial court—something administrative tribunals violate every day.

Unreasonable Searches

The Fourth Amendment forbids warrantless searches and seizures of information, yet the Administrative State violates this right to privacy through administrative subpoenas and warrants, automated information collection devices, civil investigative demands, and “voluntary” requests for information.

CASE SUMMARY

The U.S. government tried to force charter boats and companies that take customers fishing and sightseeing in the Gulf of Mexico to purchase a vessel monitoring system (VMS). Federal agencies would have used VMS tracking devices to monitor boats’ movements and whereabouts on the water, even when they are not using their federal permits to fish. NCLA’s class-action lawsuit against the U.S. Department of Commerce, NOAA, the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), and their heads, contends that these agencies were mandating an unlawful 24-hour GPS surveillance regime without a warrant. 

NCLA’s named clients, for-hire vessel operating companies and captains, would have been affected by a final rule that Commerce, NOAA, and NMFS intended to enforce. The rule would have forced owners or operators of charter vessels or for-hire vessels in the Gulf to submit electronic fishing reports using NMFS-approved hardware and software with GPS location capabilities that “at a minimum, archive vessel position data during a trip for subsequent transmission to NMFS.” The rule also would have required that captains pay for the vessel equivalent of an ankle bracelet. NCLA contended these agencies could not issue a regulation that would monitor law-abiding captains more closely than many paroled prisoners. 

The agencies claimed this rule was meant to “increase and improve fisheries information collected from federally permitted for-hire vessels in the Gulf.” But NCLA argued that warrantless access to the GPS information of a person’s locations and movements would have amounted to an unreasonable search violating the Fourth Amendment and violated Ninth Amendment rights, including the right to privacy, freedom of movement, free enterprise, freedom from unreasonable governmental interference, and the right to travel. Since plaintiffs would have been the sole owners of their devices’ data, its seizure without cause would also have violated the Fifth Amendment’s Due Process Clause. 

OUR CLIENT

Capt. Allen Walburn, Plaintiff

OUR TEAM

Kara Rollins
Litigation Counsel
Sheng Li
Litigation Counsel
John J. Vecchione
Senior Litigation Counsel

RELEVANT MATERIALS

NCLA FILINGS

Motion to Withdraw Motion for Fees and Costs

November 29, 2023 | Read More

Opinion of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

February 23, 2023 | Read More

Appellants’ Reply Brief

June 22, 2022 | Read More

Appellees’ Brief

June 1, 2022 | Read More

Brief of Amicus Curiae the Buckeye Institute in Support of Appellants and in Support of Reversal

May 9, 2022 | Read More

SEE 38 FILINGS
PRESS RELEASES

In NCLA Win, Fifth Circuit Tosses Back NMFS Rule Trying to Track Charter Boats Without a Warrant

February 23, 2023 | Read More

NCLA Files Fifth Circuit Appeal to Stop Unlawful 24/7 Tracking of Gulf of Mexico Charter Boats

May 3, 2022 | Read More

NCLA Appeals District Court Ruling Allowing Government to Unlawfully Track Gulf Charter Vessels

March 3, 2022

NCLA Successfully Petitions NOAA to Delay Warrantless 24/7 Surveillance of Charter Boats in the Gulf

November 2, 2021

Something Is Fishy in the Gulf: NOAA Forces Charter Boat Captains to Install ‘Anchor Bracelets’

September 3, 2021

SEE 8 PRESS RELEASES
IN THE MEDIA

Charter Captains Are Suing the Government Over New “Anchor Bracelet” Requirement

Field & Stream

February 7, 2023

Gulf boat operators allege high-tech fisheries monitoring violates their constitutional rights

Louisiana Record

February 7, 2023

Charter captains file federal suit over GPS, reporting rule

Cape Coral Breeze

February 7, 2023

Gulf of Mexico charter operators fight back against lawsuit mandating electronic monitoring

SeaFoodSource

February 7, 2023

Suit challenging new charter boat rules OK’d as class action

Associated Press

February 7, 2023

SEE 7 MEDIA MENTIONS

CASE HIGHLIGHTS

RELATED CASES
  • Adir International v. Starr Indemnity and Liability Company

    Due Process Violations

    The due process of law guarantees a right to be held to account only through the processes of an impartial court—something administrative tribunals violate every day.

    Case Closed -

    Agencies: California

    View Case
  • American Home Furnishings Alliance, et al. v. U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission

    Due Process Violations

    The due process of law guarantees a right to be held to account only through the processes of an impartial court—something administrative tribunals violate every day.

    Scope of Authority / Nondelegation

    The structure of the Constitution allows only Congress to legislate, only the Executive to enforce laws, and only the Judiciary to decide cases. But the Administrative State evades the Constitution’s avenues of governance when executive agencies issue regulations without statutory authorization from Congress.

    Case Closed - June 30, 2023

    Agencies: Consumer Product Safety Commission

    View Case
  • American Honda Motor Co., Inc. v. Walther, Dir., and Arkansas Department of Finance and Administration

    Judicial Deference

    Deference doctrines require judges to defer to an administrative agency’s fact finding, or its interpretation of statutes and regulations. Thus, judges surrender their independent judgment and, where the government is a party, must exhibit systematic bias in the government’s favor, which denies due process of law to the other litigant.

    Due Process Violations

    The due process of law guarantees a right to be held to account only through the processes of an impartial court—something administrative tribunals violate every day.

    Case Closed -

    Agencies: Arkansas Department of Finance and Administration

    View Case
  • American Hospital Association, et al. v. Xavier Becerra, et al.

    Judicial Deference

    Deference doctrines require judges to defer to an administrative agency’s fact finding, or its interpretation of statutes and regulations. Thus, judges surrender their independent judgment and, where the government is a party, must exhibit systematic bias in the government’s favor, which denies due process of law to the other litigant.

    Due Process Violations

    The due process of law guarantees a right to be held to account only through the processes of an impartial court—something administrative tribunals violate every day.

    Scope of Authority / Nondelegation

    The structure of the Constitution allows only Congress to legislate, only the Executive to enforce laws, and only the Judiciary to decide cases. But the Administrative State evades the Constitution’s avenues of governance when executive agencies issue regulations without statutory authorization from Congress.

    Case Closed - June 15, 2022

    Agencies: Department of Health and Human Services

    View Case
  • American Securities Association and Citadel Securities LLC v. United States Securities and Exchange Commission

    Due Process Violations

    The due process of law guarantees a right to be held to account only through the processes of an impartial court—something administrative tribunals violate every day.

    Scope of Authority / Nondelegation

    The structure of the Constitution allows only Congress to legislate, only the Executive to enforce laws, and only the Judiciary to decide cases. But the Administrative State evades the Constitution’s avenues of governance when executive agencies issue regulations without statutory authorization from Congress.

    Administrative Speech Controls

    The Administrative State tries to squelch speech, especially through licensing, speech bans, and speech mandates. Licensing requires one to get the government’s permission prior to speaking. Nothing was more clearly forbidden by the First Amendment than prior restraints on speech, but such controls are now commonplace.

    Unreasonable Searches

    The Fourth Amendment forbids warrantless searches and seizures of information, yet the Administrative State violates this right to privacy through administrative subpoenas and warrants, automated information collection devices, civil investigative demands, and “voluntary” requests for information.

    Conditions on Spending

    Administrative agencies use unconstitutional conditions on spending to regulate the conduct of grantees. Rather than rule through law, the government simply purchases submission.

    Case Active - February 15, 2024

    Agencies: Securities and Exchange Commission

    View Case
  • AMG Capital Management, LLC v. FTC and FTC v. Credit Bureau Center, LLC

    Due Process Violations

    The due process of law guarantees a right to be held to account only through the processes of an impartial court—something administrative tribunals violate every day.

    Scope of Authority / Nondelegation

    The structure of the Constitution allows only Congress to legislate, only the Executive to enforce laws, and only the Judiciary to decide cases. But the Administrative State evades the Constitution’s avenues of governance when executive agencies issue regulations without statutory authorization from Congress.

    Case Closed -

    Agencies: Federal Trade Commission

    View Case

SHARE THIS CASE

Enter your email address above to be notified whenever we post a new document to this case.