NCLA Site Search


Polyweave Packaging v. Buttigieg

NCLA filed a lawsuit against Transportation Secretary Peter Buttigieg for revoking Department of Transportation (DOT) rules that expanded and protected due process during agency enforcement actions. Filed on behalf of Polyweave Packaging, Inc., the lawsuit argued that once substantive rights are extended, no federal agency may lawfully take them away by fiat. DOT would have to conduct notice-and-comment rulemaking to repeal the rules.

On April 2, 2021, Buttigieg arbitrarily rescinded DOT’s binding rules, which recognized a comprehensive set of rights, including a new mandate that DOT personnel voluntarily disclose all exculpatory evidence to those targeted by a civil enforcement action. This rule applied the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Brady v. Maryland to the administrative context. DOT first addressed longstanding concerns about civil enforcement abuse in a February 2019 General Counsel’s memorandum. Shortly thereafter, the Bradbury Memo’s key provisions, requiring, among other things, prohibiting “fishing expedition” investigations without sufficient evidence in hand to support a violation, ending endless enforcement, and mandating fair and transparent civil penalties, were codified into binding rules.

Buttigieg seemingly revoked DOT’s due process rules to comply with President Biden’s “Day One” Executive Order demanding that agencies “rescind any orders, rules regulations, guidelines or policies” that supposedly inhibit the federal government’s ability to address “the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, economic recovery, racial justice, and climate change.” But Buttigieg did not explain why or how affording due process might “threaten” DOT’s response to these issues. Buttigieg revoked the rules without allowing Polyweave or the public to comment beforehand, and he did so without considering Polyweave’s reliance interests, even though Congress and Supreme Court precedent require it.

Sheng Li
Litigation Counsel

Opinion of the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

October 20, 2022 | Read More

Plaintiff-Appellant’s Reply Brief

February 25, 2022 | Read More

Plaintiff-Appellant’s Opening Brief

November 15, 2021 | Read More

Memorandum Opinion and Order

September 2, 2021 | Read More

Plaintiff’s Opposition to Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss and Reply in Support of Plaintiff’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction

July 22, 2021 | Read More


NCLA Files Appeal in Lawsuit Challenging Transportation Secretary Buttigieg’s ‘Gotcha’ Investigations

November 16, 2021 | Read More




Enter your email address above to be notified whenever we post a new document to this case.

In NCLA’s Bump-Stock Ban Case, U.S. Supreme Court Rules ATF Cannot Alter a Statute’s Meaning Read More >>