Sign Up

NCLA Site Search

Amicus Briefs

Tesla, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

CASE SUMMARY

NCLA filed an amicus brief in support of Tesla, Inc.’s lawsuit challenging NLRB’s March 2021 ruling that the company violated the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) and would be required to “direct [CEO Elon] Musk to delete [his] unlawful tweet.”

In the summer of 2018, the United Auto Workers union and a handful of Tesla’s employees filed a charge with NLRB alleging that Tesla committed an unfair labor practice when Mr. Musk tweeted a statement on his personal Twitter account. An NLRB administrative law judge concluded that Tesla violated labor laws “by … [t]hreatening employees on May 20, 2018, with loss of stock options if they vote in favor of the Union.”

The Board, in March 2021, decided against Tesla based entirely on its flawed decision from a few months prior in FDRLST Media, LLC v. NLRB. NCLA represented FDRLST Media, LLC in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, in an appeal from the Board’s November 2020 decision against FDRLST. There were multiple constitutional defects in the Board’s FDRLST decision, which it only exacerbated when it relied exclusively on that decision to rule against Tesla. In doing so, NLRB ignored Supreme Court and Fifth Circuit Court decisions otherwise interpreting and applying unfair labor practice statutes and the First Amendment.

In October 2024, the en banc Fifth Circuit vacated NLRB’s order against Telsa, a victory for NCLA.

OUR TEAM

Kara Rollins
Litigation Counsel
Sheng Li
Litigation Counsel
Margot Cleveland
Of Counsel

RELEVANT MATERIALS

NCLA FILINGS

Opinion of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

October 25, 2024 | Read More

Brief of the New Civil Liberties Alliance as Amicus Curiae in Support of Petitioner/Cross-Respondent Tesla, Incorporated

September 6, 2023 | Read More

Brief of Amicus Curiae New Civil Liberties Alliance In Support of Petitioner Cross-Respondent Tesla, Incorporated

August 6, 2021 | Read More

PRESS RELEASES

In NCLA Amicus Win, Fifth Circuit Vacates Order for Elon Musk to Delete X Post About Labor

October 28, 2024 | Read More

NCLA Files Amicus Brief in NLRB Lawsuit Alleging Tesla CEO Tweet Was Unfair Labor Practice

August 11, 2021 | Read More

RELATED CASES
  • American Securities Association and Citadel Securities LLC v. United States Securities and Exchange Commission

    Due Process Violations

    The due process of law guarantees a right to be held to account only through the processes of an impartial court—something administrative tribunals violate every day.

    Scope of Authority / Nondelegation

    The structure of the Constitution allows only Congress to legislate, only the Executive to enforce laws, and only the Judiciary to decide cases. But the Administrative State evades the Constitution’s avenues of governance when executive agencies issue regulations without statutory authorization from Congress.

    Administrative Speech Controls

    The Administrative State tries to squelch speech, especially through licensing, speech bans, and speech mandates. Licensing requires one to get the government’s permission prior to speaking. Nothing was more clearly forbidden by the First Amendment than prior restraints on speech, but such controls are now commonplace.

    Unreasonable Searches

    The Fourth Amendment forbids warrantless searches and seizures of information, yet the Administrative State violates this right to privacy through administrative subpoenas and warrants, automated information collection devices, civil investigative demands, and “voluntary” requests for information.

    Conditions on Spending

    Administrative agencies use unconstitutional conditions on spending to regulate the conduct of grantees. Rather than rule through law, the government simply purchases submission.

    Case Active - February 15, 2024

    Agencies: Securities and Exchange Commission

    View Case
  • Americans for Prosperity Foundation v. Rob Bonta, Attorney General of California

    Administrative Speech Controls

    The Administrative State tries to squelch speech, especially through licensing, speech bans, and speech mandates. Licensing requires one to get the government’s permission prior to speaking. Nothing was more clearly forbidden by the First Amendment than prior restraints on speech, but such controls are now commonplace.

    Case Closed - July 1, 2021

    Agencies: California Attorney General

    View Case
  • Mario Cerame, et al. v. Michael Bowler, in his official capacity as Connecticut Statewide Bar Counsel, et al.

    Administrative Speech Controls

    The Administrative State tries to squelch speech, especially through licensing, speech bans, and speech mandates. Licensing requires one to get the government’s permission prior to speaking. Nothing was more clearly forbidden by the First Amendment than prior restraints on speech, but such controls are now commonplace.

    Case Active - November 10, 2021

    Agencies: Connecticut Statewide Bar Counsel

    View Case
  • Mark Changizi, et al. v. Department of Health and Human Services, et al.

    Due Process Violations

    The due process of law guarantees a right to be held to account only through the processes of an impartial court—something administrative tribunals violate every day.

    Scope of Authority / Nondelegation

    The structure of the Constitution allows only Congress to legislate, only the Executive to enforce laws, and only the Judiciary to decide cases. But the Administrative State evades the Constitution’s avenues of governance when executive agencies issue regulations without statutory authorization from Congress.

    Administrative Speech Controls

    The Administrative State tries to squelch speech, especially through licensing, speech bans, and speech mandates. Licensing requires one to get the government’s permission prior to speaking. Nothing was more clearly forbidden by the First Amendment than prior restraints on speech, but such controls are now commonplace.

    Case Closed - September 23, 2024

    Agencies: Department of Health and Human Services | Office of Surgeon General

    View Case
  • RMS of Georgia, LLC D/B/A Choice Refrigerants v. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, et al.

    Scope of Authority / Nondelegation

    The structure of the Constitution allows only Congress to legislate, only the Executive to enforce laws, and only the Judiciary to decide cases. But the Administrative State evades the Constitution’s avenues of governance when executive agencies issue regulations without statutory authorization from Congress.

    Administrative Speech Controls

    The Administrative State tries to squelch speech, especially through licensing, speech bans, and speech mandates. Licensing requires one to get the government’s permission prior to speaking. Nothing was more clearly forbidden by the First Amendment than prior restraints on speech, but such controls are now commonplace.

    Case Closed -

    Agencies: Environmental Protection Agency

    View Case
  • RMS of Georgia, LLC D/B/A Choice Refrigerants v. Environmental Protection Agency and Michael S. Regan

    Scope of Authority / Nondelegation

    The structure of the Constitution allows only Congress to legislate, only the Executive to enforce laws, and only the Judiciary to decide cases. But the Administrative State evades the Constitution’s avenues of governance when executive agencies issue regulations without statutory authorization from Congress.

    Administrative Speech Controls

    The Administrative State tries to squelch speech, especially through licensing, speech bans, and speech mandates. Licensing requires one to get the government’s permission prior to speaking. Nothing was more clearly forbidden by the First Amendment than prior restraints on speech, but such controls are now commonplace.

    Case Active - September 14, 2023

    Agencies: Environmental Protection Agency

    View Case

SHARE THIS CASE

Enter your email address above to be notified whenever we post a new document to this case.