Amicus Briefs
SEC v. Murphy
CASE SUMMARY
In November 2022, Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) announced record-breaking enforcement results, boasting a staggering $4.2 billion in civil penalties imposed during just the past fiscal year—the agency’s “highest on record.” It did so by using putatively “civil” law enforcement powers to seek and impose severe financial penalties—calculated using arbitrary and inconsistent multipliers—against American citizens without due process and procedural protections. NCLA challenged this questionable practice in an amicus brief filed supporting rehearing en banc in SEC v. Jocelyn M. Murphy, et al. NCLA argued that the full Ninth Circuit had an excellent opportunity to bring desperately needed consistency, clarity, and discipline to the calculation of civil penalties in enforcement cases prosecuted by SEC.
OUR TEAM
RELEVANT MATERIALS
NCLA FILINGS
PRESS RELEASES
NCLA Amicus Brief Takes on SEC’s Arbitrary Calculations of Civil Penalties in Enforcement Cases
November 30, 2022 | Read More