NCLA Site Search

Amicus Briefs

West Virginia v. EPA

In this amicus brief, NCLA argued that the judgment of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit should be reversed. The Constitution vests all legislative power in Congress. This means that national policy decisions are to be made by Congress, not by administrative agencies. The decarbonization of the energy industry—which the decision below authorizes EPA to impose—is a major national policy decision that Congress has not expressly made. Further, Congress may not delegate its legislative power over this decision for EPA to make in its stead.

The Environmental Protection Agency argued that the CAA granted the agency a license to undertake virtually any program it deemed appropriate to address climate change. If construed so broadly, the CAA would divest Congress’ power to legislate on air-quality issues, weakening the Constitution’s separation of powers. NCLA’s brief offered several textual and structural reasons why the CAA did not—and Congress could not—divest legislative power.

Mark Chenoweth
President and Chief Legal Officer
Philip Hamburger
Chief Executive Officer
NCLA FILINGS

Opinion of the U.S. Supreme Court

June 30, 2022 | Read More

Amicus Curiae Brief of the New Civil Liberties Alliance in Support of Petitioners

December 20, 2021 | Read More

PRESS RELEASES

In NCLA Amicus Win, SCOTUS Limits EPA’s Regulatory Authority Under Clean Air Act

June 30, 2022 | Read More

NCLA Amicus Brief Tells SCOTUS the Clean Air Act and the Constitution Disallow EPA’s Power Grab

December 20, 2021 | Read More

IN THE MEDIA

The Major Questions Doctrine Is Compatible with Textualism

NCLA Blog

August 11, 2023

CASE HIGHLIGHTS

RELATED CASES

SHARE THIS CASE

Enter your email address above to be notified whenever we post a new document to this case.