The Relentless and Loper Bright cases are landmark victories, Chevron has been described by The Wall Street Journal as “arguably the most significant decision of the year.” This landmark decision marks the end of a 40-year era of ‘judicial deference,’ where judges blindly accepted agency interpretations of the law. Such practices undermined due process and compromised judicial independence. No case better embodies the unfairness of Chevron deference than Relentless. This decision reins in unimpeded regulatory power from the Administrative State that has degraded a free society and threatened liberty.

What will you learn about watching the discussion?

1. Our legal arguments that led to a significant victory with the Court overturning Chevron deference. NCLA has brought numerous cases challenging Chevron and similar deference schemes. The Loper Bright and Relentless cases, which contested a Commerce Department fishery regulation, were key in dismantling this doctrine.

2. How the logic of the decision applies to other forms of judicial deference, and what judicial doctrines will emerge in the wake of the decision.

3. How this decision will influence future rulings aimed at curbing the runaway Administrative State.

Panelists:

John Vecchione, NCLA Senior Litigation Counsel

Kara Rollins, NCLA Litigation Counsel