Sign Up

NCLA Site Search

John J. Vecchione

Senior Litigation Counsel


Mr. Vecchione is a Senior Litigation Counsel for the non-profit New Civil Liberties Alliance representing clients against the Administrative State. He was previously President and CEO of the non-profit Cause of Action Institute, also advancing the constitutional order. He practiced at a number of D.C. area firms, including the eponymous John J. Vecchione Law, PLLC. Mr. Vecchione focuses his practice on strategic litigation in the federal district and appellate courts, including the Supreme Court of the United States. He was Counsel of Record for the Relentless Petitioners in the landmark case Loper Bright Enters., Inc. v. Raimondo and Relentless, Inc. v. Dep’t of Com., 144 S. Ct. 2244, 2269 (2024)¸ and for four individual Respondents in Murthy v. Missouri, 144 S. Ct. 1972 (2024).

He is an experienced trial and appellate advocate having tried cases and argued appeals across the country. He is a member of the bars of the State of New York, the District of Columbia, and the Commonwealth of Virginia, as well as the Supreme Court of the United States and many federal courts. His cases are reported in scores of published opinions. He has also published pieces advancing the freedom agenda and constitutional order in The Wall Street Journal, the Washington Times and many other forums. He lives in Virginia with his wife Rebecca, sons Tommy and Joe.​

Abolish Cigie to Save the Constitution

By: John J. Vecchione March 19, 2025
The media has noted President Trump’s termination of inspectors general from more than a dozen federal agencies but has overlooked a larger threat to presidential control of the executive branch. Congress intentionally insulated the Council of the Inspectors General for Integrity and Efficiency from presidential control, essentially leaving it accountable to no one. Cigie—pronounced “Siggy”—is…
Read

Schrödinger’s Cat, Jurisdiction, and Missouri v. Biden 

By: John J. Vecchione November 12, 2024
Blogs
Missouri v. Biden was one of the premier free speech cases at the Supreme Court last term.  The Supreme Court dissolved the injunction against various Government agencies from silencing Americans with which it disagreed on such things as forced vaccination, the efficacy of vaccines, whether Hunter Biden’s laptop left in a repair shop was actually…
Read

Chevron Deference Tempts All Our Constitutional Actors to Behave Badly and It Should Go

By: John J. Vecchione January 16, 2024
Blogs
This week, we go to the Supreme Court in Relentless v. Commerce for argument on whether Chevron deference—the deference given to agencies when they interpret an ambiguous or silent statute—continue or be abandoned by the Court. Both our briefs and those of the Petitioners in Loper Bright detail Chevron deference’s constitutional, statutory, and structural errors.  But one aspect of how bad Chevron is has not…
Read