Sign Up

NCLA Site Search

Cases

Mackinac Center for Public Policy v. U.S. Department of Education

Back to Case Finder

CASE: Mackinac Center for Public Policy v. U.S. Department of Education, Miguel Cardona, and Richard Cordray ​

STATUS: Active

NCLA ROLE: Counsel

COURTS HEARD IN: E.D. Mich.

ORIGINAL COURT: U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan

DECIDING COURT: U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan

OPENED: April 6, 2023

AGENCIES: Department of Education

FOCUS AREAS:

Scope of Authority / Nondelegation

The structure of the Constitution allows only Congress to legislate, only the Executive to enforce laws, and only the Judiciary to decide cases. But the Administrative State evades the Constitution’s avenues of governance when executive agencies issue regulations without statutory authorization from Congress.

CASE SUMMARY

In response to the Covid-19 pandemic, Congress lawfully suspended monthly payment obligations and interest accrual on federally held student loans for a period limited to six months. After that statutory deferment period expired in September 2020, however, the Department of Education unilaterally extended it without congressional appropriation eight different times. In this case, NCLA challenges the legality of extending the suspension 30 months past the statutory expiration date, which has cost taxpayers over $150 billion from lost interest. Only Congress can categorically suspend repayment obligations for all student-loan borrowers nationwide, and only Congress can cancel the accrual of interest on student loan debt owed to the United States

Congress enacted the Public Service Loan Forgiveness Program (PSLF) in 2007 to help 501(c)(3) nonprofit organizations like the Mackinac Center attract employees with a debt-relief incentive keyed to working ten years for nonprofits. The Department of Education’s suspension of repayment obligations is an unlawful form of debt relief that substantially reduces the incentives PSLF provides and thus undermines Congress’s goals in enacting that program. As NCLA has argued previously, reducing that incentive directly harms nonprofit employers.

OUR TEAM

Mark Chenoweth
President and Chief Legal Officer
Sheng Li
Litigation Counsel
Russ Ryan
Senior Litigation Counsel

RELEVANT MATERIALS

NCLA FILINGS

Notice of Appeal

September 13, 2024 | Read More

Opinion and Order Granting Defendants' Motion to Dismiss and Dismissing Case Without Prejudice

July 18, 2024 | Read More

Plaintiff’s Memorandum in Opposition to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss

December 4, 2023 | Read More

First Amended Complaint for Declaratory, Injunctive, and Other Relief

October 6, 2023 | Read More

Plaintiff’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction

May 11, 2023 | Read More

PRESS RELEASES

NCLA Asks Court to Uphold Lawsuit Against Dep’t of Education’s Illegal Student Loan Payment Pause

December 5, 2023 | Read More

Mackinac Center Asks Federal Court to Immediately Halt ED’s Unlawful Student Loan Payment Pause

May 11, 2023 | Read More

NCLA and Mackinac Center Challenge Unlawful Extensions of Federal Student Loan Deferments

April 19, 2023 | Read More

RELATED CASES
  • Javier Aguila, et al. v. Doug Ducey, et al.​

    Scope of Authority / Nondelegation

    The structure of the Constitution allows only Congress to legislate, only the Executive to enforce laws, and only the Judiciary to decide cases. But the Administrative State evades the Constitution’s avenues of governance when executive agencies issue regulations without statutory authorization from Congress.

    Case Closed -

    Agencies: Arizona Governor

    View Case
  • States of Alaska, South Carolina, and Texas v. Department of Education, et al.

    Scope of Authority / Nondelegation

    The structure of the Constitution allows only Congress to legislate, only the Executive to enforce laws, and only the Judiciary to decide cases. But the Administrative State evades the Constitution’s avenues of governance when executive agencies issue regulations without statutory authorization from Congress.

    Case Active - July 16, 2024

    Agencies: Department of Education

    View Case
  • Allstates Refractory Contractors LLC v. Julie A. Su, in her official capacity as Acting Secretary of Labor, et al.

    Scope of Authority / Nondelegation

    The structure of the Constitution allows only Congress to legislate, only the Executive to enforce laws, and only the Judiciary to decide cases. But the Administrative State evades the Constitution’s avenues of governance when executive agencies issue regulations without statutory authorization from Congress.

    Case Closed - July 2, 2024

    Agencies: Department of Labor | Occupation Safety and Health Administration

    View Case
  • Alpine Securities Corporation v. Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, United States of America

    Scope of Authority / Nondelegation

    The structure of the Constitution allows only Congress to legislate, only the Executive to enforce laws, and only the Judiciary to decide cases. But the Administrative State evades the Constitution’s avenues of governance when executive agencies issue regulations without statutory authorization from Congress.

    Case Active - September 5, 2023

    Agencies: Financial Industry Regulatory Authority

    View Case
  • American Home Furnishings Alliance, et al. v. U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission

    Due Process Violations

    The due process of law guarantees a right to be held to account only through the processes of an impartial court—something administrative tribunals violate every day.

    Scope of Authority / Nondelegation

    The structure of the Constitution allows only Congress to legislate, only the Executive to enforce laws, and only the Judiciary to decide cases. But the Administrative State evades the Constitution’s avenues of governance when executive agencies issue regulations without statutory authorization from Congress.

    Case Closed - June 30, 2023

    Agencies: Consumer Product Safety Commission

    View Case
  • American Hospital Association, et al. v. Xavier Becerra, et al.

    Judicial Deference

    Deference doctrines require judges to defer to an administrative agency’s fact finding, or its interpretation of statutes and regulations. Thus, judges surrender their independent judgment and, where the government is a party, must exhibit systematic bias in the government’s favor, which denies due process of law to the other litigant.

    Due Process Violations

    The due process of law guarantees a right to be held to account only through the processes of an impartial court—something administrative tribunals violate every day.

    Scope of Authority / Nondelegation

    The structure of the Constitution allows only Congress to legislate, only the Executive to enforce laws, and only the Judiciary to decide cases. But the Administrative State evades the Constitution’s avenues of governance when executive agencies issue regulations without statutory authorization from Congress.

    Case Closed - June 15, 2022

    Agencies: Department of Health and Human Services

    View Case

SHARE THIS CASE

Enter your email address above to be notified whenever we post a new document to this case.