Media Room
Commentary
Post Search
COVID-19 Executive Orders: Read the Fine Print
Caleb Kruckenbergcategory_listCovid-19 Articles
Many of us have heard the adage that “hard cases make bad law,” but a more apt description might be “emergencies create worse law.” In an emergency, we often expect our government to do something to help us. Sometimes, though, that something is worse than the emergency. With the world reeling from the novel…
Read
Two Years Removed from Lucia v. SEC, New & Old Challenges Face Litigants
Jared McClain
A lot of pages and energy have been spent outlining the many problems with formal, doctrinal judicial abdication like that set out by the Supreme Court in Chevron v. Natural Resources Defense Council and Auer v. Robbins. But other, more subtle judicial tendencies also distort the judicial office at serious cost to litigants and…
Read
Comments in Response to the Office of Management and Budget’s Improving and Reforming Regulatory Enforcement and Adjudication Notice
In the News
NCLA’s examples document that recommendations that examine whether the current modes of rulemaking, enforcement and adjudication do not always comply with the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) and the U.S. Constitution. These examples are drawn from real cases—mostly cases in which NCLA represents the party involved. NCLA knows firsthand the many ways in which agencies need…
Read
Our Zombified Courts
Peggy Little
The founders believed that trial by jury was among the most precious rights secured by our federal constitution. State constitutions similarly protect the right to be judged by a jury of one’s peers in some form in every state. New Civil Liberties Alliance, where I work, is dedicated to restoring and protecting those rights.…
Read
Brand X deference advances ‘administrative absolutism’

When Justice Clarence Thomas dissented from the denial of certiorari last week in Howard and Karen Baldwin v. U.S., he lamented that “Brand X has taken this Court to the precipice of administrative absolutism.” Given that Thomas himself authored NCTA v. Brand X Internet Services in 2005, the case that launched the Brand X judicial deference doctrine, this turnabout…
Read
The Games Bureaucrats Play: FCC Streamlined Hearing Rule—Balderdash
Michael P. DeGrandis
The Federal Communications Commission is proposing a new regulation to “promote more efficient resolution of hearings.” The Procedural Streamlining of Administrative Hearings Rule, as the FCC calls it, claims that none of its hearings require oral testimony. For decade after decade and Commission after Commission, the FCC has held trial-like adjudications with oral testimony pursuant…
Read
Media Team

