Moroney v. CFPB

Join the new civil liberties movement. Protect Americans from the Administrative State!

CASE STATUS:
Active

CASE START DATE:
December 19, 2019

DECIDING COURT:
Southern District of New York, White Plains Division

ORIGINAL COURT:
N/A

 

CASE SUMMARY

The New Civil Liberties Alliance has filed a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York challenging the funding mechanism for the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) as unconstitutional. Specifically, NCLA alleges that Congress unlawfully divested its legislative appropriations power when it gave CFPB the ability to draw funding directly from the Federal Reserve, without annual appropriations from Congress and without oversight from the appropriations committees of Congress. By giving the power of the purse—a core legislative power—over to an executive branch agency, Congress violated Article I of the Constitution, which vests ALL legislative power in Congress, including appropriations power.

This case, entitled Law Offices of Crystal Moroney v. Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection, may ultimately provide the U.S. Supreme Court the opportunity to revive the Non delegation Doctrine that five justices expressed interest in revisiting earlier this year in the wake of last June’s Gundy v. United States decision.

NCLA also contends that CFPB acted beyond its constitutional authority when it targeted Ms. Maroney’s Law Firm with a Civil Investigative Demand, withdrew that CID on the cusp of her federal court hearing challenging it, and then promptly issued a new CID practically identical to the original one as soon as the case was dismissed as moot. The complaint asks the Court to redress this fundamental denial of Crystal Moroney’s right to due process.

Finally, the case also preserves the objection that Congress may not vest executive authority in CFPB, an independent agency led by a single director, while also shielding that agency’s director from Presidential oversight and removal. Such a regime clearly violates the President’s constitutional duty to “take Care” that the laws are faithfully executed. That objection to CFPB’s structure is pending at the U.S. Supreme Court in Seila Law, LLC v. CFPB. NCLA filed an amicus curia brief in that case this week too, arguing that the President must have the power to remove any federal officer who exercises executive power. 

CASE DOCUMENTS

December 18, 2019 | Verified Complaint for Permanent Injunctive and Declaratory Relief
Plaintiff Law Offices of Crystal Moroney, P.C. (“Ms. Moroney’s Law Firm”) submits this Complaint for Permanent Injunctive and Declaratory Relief to prohibit Defendant Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection, also known as the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (“the Bureau” or “CFPB”), and Defendant Director Kathy Kraninger, from perpetuating a lawless and retaliatory Civil Investigative Demand against Ms. Moroney’s Law Firm, and alleges as follows: Click here to read full legal document.

PRESS RELEASE

December 19, 2019 |NCLA Lawsuit Says CFPB Is Funded Unconstitutionally—Congress Cannot Divest Legislative Power

Washington, DC (December 19, 2019)​ – The New Civil Liberties Alliance has filed a ​lawsuit​ in the U.S.District Court for the Southern District of New York challenging the funding mechanism for the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) as unconstitutional. Specifically, NCLA alleges that Congress unlawfully divested its legislative appropriations power when it gave CFPB the ability to draw funding directly from the Federal Reserve, without annual appropriations from Congress and without oversight from the appropriations committees of Congress. By giving the power of the purse—a core legislative power—over to an executive branch agency, Congress violated Article I of the Constitution, which vests ALL legislative power in Congress, including appropriations power.

This case, entitled ​Law Offices of Crystal Moroney v. Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection​, may ultimately provide the U.S. Supreme Court the opportunity to revive the Nondelegation Doctrine that five justices expressed interest in revisiting earlier this year in the wake of last June’s ​Gundy v. United States decision.

NCLA also contends that CFPB acted beyond its constitutional authority when it targeted Ms. Maroney’s Law Firm with a Civil Investigative Demand, withdrew that CID on the cusp of her federal court hearing challenging it, and then promptly issued a new CID practically identical to the original one as soon as the case was dismissed as moot. The complaint asks the Court to redress this fundamental denial of Crystal Moroney’s right to due process.

Finally, the case also preserves the objection that ​Congress may not vest executive authority in CFPB, an independent agency led by a single director, while also shielding that agency’s director from Presidential oversight and removal. Such a regime clearly violates the President’s constitutional duty to “take Care” that the laws are faithfully executed. That objection to CFPB’s structure is pending at the U.S. Supreme Court in ​Seila Law, LLC v. CFPB​. NCLA filed an ​amicus curia​​ brief​ in that case this week too, arguing that the President must have the power to remove any federal officer who exercises executive power.

NCLA released the following statements: “Crystal Moroney and the law firm she has built are victims of the Administrative State. Her plight is all too familiar to those of us fighting to restore constitutional constraints on federal agencies. On the bright side, her case will afford an excellent opportunity to call into question the highly irregular—and almost certainly unconstitutional—way in which Congress has funded CFPB.”— ​Mark Chenoweth, NCLA Executive Director and General Counsel

“This case illustrates what happens to civil liberties when an administrative agency lacking anysemblance of control or oversight from the executive or legislative branches turns on the citizens it purportedly exists to serve. Only the judicial branch can vindicate Ms. Maroney’s civil liberties by restoring accountable,constitutional government.” — ​Michael P. DeGrandis, NCLA Senior Litigation Counsel

“The serial investigations of the Plaintiff expose the CFPB’s cynical investigatory practices andreprehensible litigation tactics for what they truly are—brazenly unconstitutional abuses of process. It is longpast time for CFPB to face the judicial scrutiny that it has so contemptuously circumvented over the last twoand a half years.” — ​Jessica Thompson, NCLA Litigation Counsel

ABOUT NCLA – NCLA is a nonprofit civil rights organization founded by prominent legal scholar ​Philip Hamburger​ to protectconstitutional freedoms from violations by the Administrative State. NCLA’s​​public-interest litigation andother ​pro bono​ advocacy strive to tame the unlawful power of state and federal agencies and to foster a newcivil liberties movement that will help restore Americans’ fundamental rights.For more information, visit us online: ​NCLAlegal.org​.

 

Click here to download

OPINION

MEDIA MENTIONS