Proven social media censorship suggests hidden gold mine of federal coercion, plaintiffs tell court
The Supreme Court set a high bar in June for states and individuals to challenge government-tinged censorship of social media, reversing a preliminary injunction against the feds because platforms were already suppressing plaintiffs’ posts when public officials targeted them.
Censored doctors Jay Bhattacharya, Martin Kulldorff and Aaron Kheriaty, activist Jill Hines and Gateway Pundit publisher Jim Hoft, and the attorneys general of Louisiana and Missouri believe they can meet that high bar, if a court will let them keep digging for evidence.
The plaintiffs in Missouri v. Biden returned to the Western District of Louisiana this week to show their cards – email conversations already obtained through their litigation, a similar case by journalist Alex Berenson, the Twitter Files and congressional investigations – arguing the evidence justifies more legal discovery likely to reveal enough to satisfy SCOTUS…
The New Civil Liberties Alliance is representing the individuals except for Hoft, represented by St. Louis lawyer John Burns…
September 20, 2024
Originally Published in Just the News