Donate
Sign Up

NCLA Site Search

Cases

The Daily Wire, The Federalist, Texas v. State Department

CASE SUMMARY

The State Department used its Global Engagement Center (“GEC”) to finance the development and promotion of censorship technology and enterprises, including NewsGuard and the Global Disinformation Index. These censorship technologies and enterprises targeted many conservative media outlets, including The Daily Wire and The Federalist, seeking to defund and suppress conservative news.

The State Department’s censorship scheme violated the First Amendment rights of The Daily Wire, The Federalist, and numerous similar outlets. The State of Texas joined NCLA in this lawsuit, recognizing that this enterprise interfered in its sovereign interest in enforcing Texas’ law requiring social media companies with market power to provide non-discriminatory services as common carriers.

OUR TEAM

Margaret A. Little
Senior Litigation Counsel
Margot Cleveland
Of Counsel
Casey Norman
Litigation Counsel
Jenin Younes
Litigation Counsel

RELEVANT MATERIALS

NCLA FILINGS

Plaintiff's Response in Opposition to Defendant's Rule 12(h)(3) Motion to Dismiss, Alternatively Motion to Reconsider (Dkt. 53)

September 20, 2024 | Read More

Order Granting Expedited Discovery

May 7, 2024 | Read More

Memorandum Opinion and Order Granting in Part and Denying in Part Motion to Dismiss and Motion to Transfer

May 7, 2024 | Read More

Plaintiffs’ Reply in Support of Motion for Preliminary Injunction

April 12, 2024 | Read More

Plaintiffs’ Response in Opposition to Motion to Dismiss

April 10, 2024 | Read More

SEE 8 FILINGS
PRESS RELEASES

Sec’y of State Marco Rubio Admits State Dept. Part of Censorship Industrial Complex, as NCLA Alleged

April 17, 2025 | Read More

In NCLA Victory Against Censorship, State Department Shutters Global Engagement Center

January 2, 2025 | Read More

NCLA Defeats Motion to Dismiss, Wins Expedited Discovery in Suit Alleging State Dept. Censorship

May 7, 2024 | Read More

NCLA Seeks Injunction to Halt U.S. State Department-Funded Censorship of Domestic Speech & Press

February 7, 2024 | Read More

NCLA Launches Lawsuit Against U.S. State Department-Funded Censorship Regime

December 6, 2023 | Read More

IN THE MEDIA

All the News Fit for You To Hear

December 6, 2023

RELATED CASES
  • American Securities Association and Citadel Securities LLC v. United States Securities and Exchange Commission

    Due Process Violations

    The due process of law guarantees a right to be held to account only through the processes of an impartial court—something administrative tribunals violate every day.

    Scope of Authority / Nondelegation

    The structure of the Constitution allows only Congress to legislate, only the Executive to enforce laws, and only the Judiciary to decide cases. But the Administrative State evades the Constitution’s avenues of governance when executive agencies issue regulations without statutory authorization from Congress.

    Administrative Speech Controls

    The Administrative State tries to squelch speech, especially through licensing, speech bans, and speech mandates. Licensing requires one to get the government’s permission prior to speaking. Nothing was more clearly forbidden by the First Amendment than prior restraints on speech, but such controls are now commonplace.

    Unreasonable Searches

    The Fourth Amendment forbids warrantless searches and seizures of information, yet the Administrative State violates this right to privacy through administrative subpoenas and warrants, automated information collection devices, civil investigative demands, and “voluntary” requests for information.

    Conditions on Spending

    Administrative agencies use unconstitutional conditions on spending to regulate the conduct of grantees. Rather than rule through law, the government simply purchases submission.

    Case Active - February 15, 2024

    Agencies: Securities and Exchange Commission

    View Case
  • Americans for Prosperity Foundation v. Rob Bonta, Attorney General of California

    Administrative Speech Controls

    The Administrative State tries to squelch speech, especially through licensing, speech bans, and speech mandates. Licensing requires one to get the government’s permission prior to speaking. Nothing was more clearly forbidden by the First Amendment than prior restraints on speech, but such controls are now commonplace.

    Case Closed - July 1, 2021

    Agencies: California Attorney General

    View Case
  • Mario Cerame, et al. v. Christopher L. Slack, in his official capacity as Connecticut Statewide Bar Counsel, et al.

    Administrative Speech Controls

    The Administrative State tries to squelch speech, especially through licensing, speech bans, and speech mandates. Licensing requires one to get the government’s permission prior to speaking. Nothing was more clearly forbidden by the First Amendment than prior restraints on speech, but such controls are now commonplace.

    Case Active - November 10, 2021

    Agencies: Connecticut Statewide Bar Counsel

    View Case
  • Mark Changizi, et al. v. Department of Health and Human Services, et al.

    Due Process Violations

    The due process of law guarantees a right to be held to account only through the processes of an impartial court—something administrative tribunals violate every day.

    Scope of Authority / Nondelegation

    The structure of the Constitution allows only Congress to legislate, only the Executive to enforce laws, and only the Judiciary to decide cases. But the Administrative State evades the Constitution’s avenues of governance when executive agencies issue regulations without statutory authorization from Congress.

    Administrative Speech Controls

    The Administrative State tries to squelch speech, especially through licensing, speech bans, and speech mandates. Licensing requires one to get the government’s permission prior to speaking. Nothing was more clearly forbidden by the First Amendment than prior restraints on speech, but such controls are now commonplace.

    Case Closed - September 23, 2024

    Agencies: Department of Health and Human Services | Office of Surgeon General

    View Case
  • RMS of Georgia, LLC D/B/A Choice Refrigerants v. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, et al.

    Scope of Authority / Nondelegation

    The structure of the Constitution allows only Congress to legislate, only the Executive to enforce laws, and only the Judiciary to decide cases. But the Administrative State evades the Constitution’s avenues of governance when executive agencies issue regulations without statutory authorization from Congress.

    Administrative Speech Controls

    The Administrative State tries to squelch speech, especially through licensing, speech bans, and speech mandates. Licensing requires one to get the government’s permission prior to speaking. Nothing was more clearly forbidden by the First Amendment than prior restraints on speech, but such controls are now commonplace.

    Case Closed -

    Agencies: Environmental Protection Agency

    View Case
  • RMS of Georgia, LLC D/B/A Choice Refrigerants v. Environmental Protection Agency and Michael S. Regan

    Scope of Authority / Nondelegation

    The structure of the Constitution allows only Congress to legislate, only the Executive to enforce laws, and only the Judiciary to decide cases. But the Administrative State evades the Constitution’s avenues of governance when executive agencies issue regulations without statutory authorization from Congress.

    Administrative Speech Controls

    The Administrative State tries to squelch speech, especially through licensing, speech bans, and speech mandates. Licensing requires one to get the government’s permission prior to speaking. Nothing was more clearly forbidden by the First Amendment than prior restraints on speech, but such controls are now commonplace.

    Case Active - September 14, 2023

    Agencies: Environmental Protection Agency

    View Case

SHARE THIS CASE

Enter your email address above to be notified whenever we post a new document to this case.

+