Amicus Brief: TWISM Enterprises, LLC v. State Board of Registration for Professional Engineers and Surveyors

AMICUS BRIEF SUMMARY

NCLA argues that the Hamilton County Court of Appeals erred by deferring to the Ohio Board of Registration for Professional Engineers and Surveyors’ “reasonable interpretation” of what the court characterized as “ambiguous statutes and administrative rules.” Agency deference violates the Ohio and federal constitutions by requiring judges to abandon their duty of independent judgment.

Join the new civil liberties movement. Protect Americans from the Administrative State!

CASE: TWISM Enterprises, LLC v. State Board of Registration for Professional Engineers and Surveyors

COURT: Supreme Court of Ohio

DOCUMENT: N/A

COUNSEL FOR AMICUS CURIAE: Casey Norman

FILED: April 18, 2022

CASE DOCUMENTS

December 29, 2022 | Opinion of the Supreme Court of Ohio
Click here to read the full document.
April 18, 2022 | Brief Amicus Curiae of the New Civil Liberties Alliance in Support of Appellant TWISM Enterprises, LLC
Click here to read the full document.

PRESS RELEASES

January 3, 2023 | In NCLA Amicus Win, Ohio Supreme Court Rejects Deference to Agency Interpretations

Washington, DC (January 3, 2023) – The Supreme Court of Ohio, in a 4-3 opinion, denounced agency deference and ruled that the state’s courts need not defer to agency interpretations of ambiguous statutes. In no uncertain terms, Justice Pat DeWine, writing for the majority, stated, “We reaffirm today that it is the role of the judiciary, not administrative agencies, to make the ultimate determination about what the law means. Thus, the judicial branch is never required to defer to an agency’s interpretation of the law.” The New Civil Liberties Alliance, a nonpartisan, nonprofit civil rights group, filed an amicus brief in TWISM Enterprises, LLC v. State Board of Registration for Professional Engineers and Surveyors, urging the Supreme Court of Ohio to declare agency deference unconstitutional. 

NCLA argued in its amicus brief that the Hamilton County Court of Appeals erred by deferring to the Ohio Board of Registration for Professional Engineers and Surveyors’ “reasonable interpretation” of a statute setting forth the requirements that engineering firms must fulfill to provide their services in Ohio. TWISM Enterprises, LLC, a small, Cincinnati-based engineering firm, was denied its application for a Certificate of Authorization (COA) to provide professional engineering services to the public because TWISM designated an independent contractor, rather than a full-time, W-2 employee, as its engineering manager. The Board claimed that the statute precluded TWISM from designating its independent contractor—a licensed professional engineer who himself held a COA—to serve as the firm’s manager, notwithstanding the absence of any statutory language supporting this purported requirement. Such agency deference, NCLA’s brief argued, is nothing more than a command that courts abandon their duty of independent judgment and assign controlling weight to a non-judicial entity’s statutory interpretation. 

In line with NCLA’s analysis, the Supreme Court of Ohio held that mandatory agency deference violates separation-of-powers principles and strips courts of the judicial authority “to say what the law is.” Citing NCLA founder and CEO Philip Hamburger’s scholarship, the Court also highlighted how agency deference results in systematically biased judgments in cases where a government agency is also a party. 

Applying its independent judgment, the Court found nothing in the statute’s language to preclude an independent contractor from serving as a full-time manager of an engineering firm. As Justice DeWine explained, “an [agency’s] interpretation should never be used to alter the meaning of clear text.” Addressing Ohio’s previously “confused state” of caselaw on agency deference, Justice DeWine made clear that “Ohio’s system of separation of powers precludes any sort of mandatory deference to agency interpretations.” Further, Justice DeWine wrote that Ohio courts may not construe ambiguity in the language of a statute “as an implicit delegation of power to administrative agencies to fill in statutory gaps.” To the contrary, the Court concluded, agency deference is permissive rather than mandatory and may occur only when a statutory term is ambiguous.

The authority to render definitive interpretations “to say what the law is” has long been understood as resting exclusively with the judicial branch. NCLA commends the Supreme Court of Ohio for ruling that courts, not government agencies, have the final say over ambiguous laws. 

NCLA released the following statements: 

“Over recent years, the state supreme courts and legislatures have been leaders in recognizing that fundamental constitutional protections are destroyed when courts defer to the most powerful litigators before them, the government. NCLA is encouraged to see Ohio recognize this issue as well and side in favor of constitutional order. We hope to see the federal courts recognize the same.”
— Kara Rollins, Litigation Counsel, NCLA

“The Ohio Supreme Court’s ruling is an excellent step forward in putting an end to the unconstitutional practice of agency deference and returning the exclusive duty ‘to say what the law is’ to the courts. NCLA applauds the Court for clarifying Ohio’s deference jurisprudence and joining the increasing number of courts in other states who have similarly rejected deference and declined to cede judicial authority to executive agencies.”
— Casey Norman, Staff Counsel, NCLA

For more information, visit the amicus brief page here.

ABOUT NCLA

NCLA is a nonpartisan, nonprofit civil rights group founded by prominent legal scholar Philip Hamburger to protect constitutional freedoms from violations by the Administrative State. NCLA’s public-interest litigation and other pro bono advocacy strive to tame the unlawful power of state and federal agencies and to foster a new civil liberties movement that will help restore Americans’ fundamental rights.

Download the full document

April 18, 2022 | NCLA Amicus Brief Asks Ohio Supreme Court to Stop Courts from Deferring to Agency Interpretations

Washington, DC (April 18, 2022) The New Civil Liberties Alliance, a nonpartisan, nonprofit civil rights group, filed an amicus brief today in TWISM Enterprises, LLC v. State Board of Registration for Professional Engineers and Surveyors, urging the Supreme Court of Ohio to declare agency deference unconstitutional. NCLA argues that the Hamilton County Court of Appeals erred by deferring to the Ohio Board of Registration for Professional Engineers and Surveyors’ “reasonable interpretation” of what the court characterized as “ambiguous statutes and administrative rules.” Agency deference violates the Ohio and federal constitutions by requiring judges to abandon their duty of independent judgment.

TWISM Enterprises, LLC, a small, Cincinnati-based engineering firm, applied for a Certificate of Authorization (COA) to provide professional engineering services to the public, which was denied by the Board on February 28, 2019. According to the Board, TWISM’s application was denied solely because TWISM “did not designate one or more full-time partners, managers, members, officers, or directors as being responsible for and in responsible charge of the professional engineering … activities and decisions, and those designated persons shall be registered in this state,” as required by state law. The Board claimed that the Ohio Administrative Code precluded TWISM from designating their independent contractor, a licensed professional engineer who himself held a COA, to serve as the firm’s manager.

The Hamilton County Common Pleas Court had ruled in favor of TWISM, finding that the statute “does not put forth any requirements regarding what kind of employment, i.e., ‘W-2’ or ‘1099’ employment,” is mandated, nor does it “state that a designated manager must devote all his or her time” to a single firm. On appeal, the appellate court, however, concluded that, because “both parties’ definitions of ‘full-time manager’ are reasonable,” it must defer to “the Board’s reasonable interpretation[.]”

Granting deference to agency statutory interpretations, NCLA’s brief argues, violates both the state and federal constitutions for two reasons. First, agency deference requires judges to abandon their duty of independent judgment in violation of Article IV of the Ohio Constitution. Second, agency deference violates the Due Process Clauses of the Ohio Constitution and the Fourteenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution by commanding judicial bias in favor of a (government) litigant. Agency deference is nothing more than a command that courts abandon their duty of independent judgment and assign controlling weight to a non-judicial entity’s interpretation of a statute. It is the same in principle as a court deferring to statutory interpretations announced by a congressional committee, a group of expert legal scholars, or The Columbus Dispatch’s editorial page.

NCLA released the following statements:

“Deference to agency decisions raises a host of constitutional concerns as it impermissibly requires courts to place their thumb on the scale in favor of a particular litigant—the government. The Ohio Supreme Court would do well to join its sister state supreme courts and jettison the practice of deference altogether.”
Kara Rollins, Litigation Counsel, NCLA

“Agency deference abrogates the duty of the courts to say what the law is, resulting in an unconstitutional aggrandizement of the power of executive agencies at the expense of the judicial and legislative branches. The Ohio Supreme Court’s past use of deference is particularly concerning due to its inconsistent application of the doctrine. This case presents an opportunity for the Court to clarify its jurisprudence by refusing to defer to the Board’s statutory interpretation and by repudiating agency deference, generally.”
Casey Norman, Staff Counsel, NCLA

For more information, visit the amicus brief page here.

ABOUT NCLA

NCLA is a nonpartisan, nonprofit civil rights group founded by prominent legal scholar Philip Hamburger to protect constitutional freedoms from violations by the Administrative State. NCLA’s public-interest litigation and other pro bono advocacy strive to tame the unlawful power of state and federal agencies and to foster a new civil liberties movement that will help restore Americans’ fundamental rights.

Download the full document

OPINION

MEDIA MENTIONS