Sign Up

NCLA Site Search

Cases

SEC v. Spartan Securities Group

CASE SUMMARY

SEC accused market-maker Spartan Securities Group and transfer agent Island Capital Management of involvement in filing Form 211 applications with the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority to publicly list 19 issuers’ common stock to be traded and available to investors. SEC eventually discovered the issuers had been involved in fraud, subsequently faulting Spartan and Island for failing to discover the misconduct. The agency also claimed the companies failed to investigate certain SEC “red flags” FINRA raised. However, SEC has repeatedly emphasized the limited nature of the obligation of market-makers and rejected any view that they have a special due diligence requirement to look beyond the statements made to them by issuers of securities. 

Neither Spartan, Island, nor any of their employees were involved in creating or operating the issuers named in the complaint. They amply complied with statutory obligations, gathered all required information, and compiled reams of documents supporting the applications above and beyond the lawful requirements. NCLA argued SEC was attempting to hold the defendants liable under an arbitrary expansion of the requirements of applicable rules set out by Congress and the Commission itself. SEC’s Division of Enforcement would have held the market-makers responsible, despite both FINRA regulators and SEC examiners analyzing the same information and declaring it valid and genuine. 

In July 2021, federal jurors in the Middle District of Florida delivered a favorable verdict in the case, fully exonerating NCLA clients David Lopez, former Chief Compliance Officer for Spartan and Island. The jury also ruled in favor of NCLA’s other clients, Spartan and Carl Dilley (on 12 out of 13 charges), and Micah Eldred and Island Stock Transfer (on 11 counts out of 12), rejecting multiple allegations of fraud, aiding and abetting, as well as regulatory violations of the 1933 Securities Act and the 1934 Securities Exchange Act. 

OUR CLIENT

Carl Dilley and Micah Eldred, Defendants

OUR TEAM

Kara Rollins
Litigation Counsel
John J. Vecchione
Senior Litigation Counsel

RELEVANT MATERIALS

NCLA FILINGS

Rule 28(j) Letter in U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission v. Spartan Securities Group, Ltd., et al. (No. 22-13129)

July 3, 2024 | Read More

Re: Rule 28(j) Letter U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission v. Spartan Securities Group, Ltd., et al. (No. 22-13129): Regarding Erlinginger v. United States

June 26, 2024 | Read More

Re: Rule 28(j) Letter - U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission v. Spartan Securities Group, Ltd., et al. (No. 22-13129): Regarding Starbucks v. McKinney

June 26, 2024 | Read More

Defendants-Appellants' Supplemental Brief

May 14, 2024 | Read More

Rule 28(j) Letter

November 2, 2023 | Read More

SEE 21 FILINGS
PRESS RELEASES

NCLA Calls on 11th Cir. to Vacate District Court’s Judgment in Case SEC Never Should Have Brought

January 17, 2023 | Read More

Judge Enters Reduced Penalty for NCLA Clients Exonerated from Excessive SEC Charges

August 10, 2022 | Read More

NCLA Celebrates Jury Verdict Exonerating Our Clients from a Dozen Inaccurate SEC Charges

July 30, 2021 | Read More

Jury Trial Begins in Case Challenging SEC’s Arbitrary Expansion of Rules for Securities Companies

July 13, 2021 | Read More

NCLA Files for Summary Judgment in Case Where SEC Is Seeking to Enforce Guidance Instead of Law

August 21, 2020

IN THE MEDIA

SEC Loses Jury Trial Against Spartan In Shell Factory Case

Law360

February 7, 2023

Week Ahead in Securities

Reuters

February 7, 2023

SEC Fights To Call Spartan Shell Factory At Trial

Law360

February 7, 2023

Broker-Dealer Says SEC Overstepping In Sham Cos. Suit

Law360

February 7, 2023

CASE HIGHLIGHTS

RELATED CASES
  • Adir International v. Starr Indemnity and Liability Company

    Due Process Violations

    The due process of law guarantees a right to be held to account only through the processes of an impartial court—something administrative tribunals violate every day.

    Case Closed -

    Agencies: California

    View Case
  • American Home Furnishings Alliance, et al. v. U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission

    Due Process Violations

    The due process of law guarantees a right to be held to account only through the processes of an impartial court—something administrative tribunals violate every day.

    Scope of Authority / Nondelegation

    The structure of the Constitution allows only Congress to legislate, only the Executive to enforce laws, and only the Judiciary to decide cases. But the Administrative State evades the Constitution’s avenues of governance when executive agencies issue regulations without statutory authorization from Congress.

    Case Closed - June 30, 2023

    Agencies: Consumer Product Safety Commission

    View Case
  • American Honda Motor Co., Inc. v. Walther, Dir., and Arkansas Department of Finance and Administration

    Judicial Deference

    Deference doctrines require judges to defer to an administrative agency’s fact finding, or its interpretation of statutes and regulations. Thus, judges surrender their independent judgment and, where the government is a party, must exhibit systematic bias in the government’s favor, which denies due process of law to the other litigant.

    Due Process Violations

    The due process of law guarantees a right to be held to account only through the processes of an impartial court—something administrative tribunals violate every day.

    Case Closed -

    Agencies: Arkansas Department of Finance and Administration

    View Case
  • American Hospital Association, et al. v. Xavier Becerra, et al.

    Judicial Deference

    Deference doctrines require judges to defer to an administrative agency’s fact finding, or its interpretation of statutes and regulations. Thus, judges surrender their independent judgment and, where the government is a party, must exhibit systematic bias in the government’s favor, which denies due process of law to the other litigant.

    Due Process Violations

    The due process of law guarantees a right to be held to account only through the processes of an impartial court—something administrative tribunals violate every day.

    Scope of Authority / Nondelegation

    The structure of the Constitution allows only Congress to legislate, only the Executive to enforce laws, and only the Judiciary to decide cases. But the Administrative State evades the Constitution’s avenues of governance when executive agencies issue regulations without statutory authorization from Congress.

    Case Closed - June 15, 2022

    Agencies: Department of Health and Human Services

    View Case
  • American Securities Association and Citadel Securities LLC v. United States Securities and Exchange Commission

    Due Process Violations

    The due process of law guarantees a right to be held to account only through the processes of an impartial court—something administrative tribunals violate every day.

    Scope of Authority / Nondelegation

    The structure of the Constitution allows only Congress to legislate, only the Executive to enforce laws, and only the Judiciary to decide cases. But the Administrative State evades the Constitution’s avenues of governance when executive agencies issue regulations without statutory authorization from Congress.

    Administrative Speech Controls

    The Administrative State tries to squelch speech, especially through licensing, speech bans, and speech mandates. Licensing requires one to get the government’s permission prior to speaking. Nothing was more clearly forbidden by the First Amendment than prior restraints on speech, but such controls are now commonplace.

    Unreasonable Searches

    The Fourth Amendment forbids warrantless searches and seizures of information, yet the Administrative State violates this right to privacy through administrative subpoenas and warrants, automated information collection devices, civil investigative demands, and “voluntary” requests for information.

    Conditions on Spending

    Administrative agencies use unconstitutional conditions on spending to regulate the conduct of grantees. Rather than rule through law, the government simply purchases submission.

    Case Active - February 15, 2024

    Agencies: Securities and Exchange Commission

    View Case
  • AMG Capital Management, LLC v. FTC and FTC v. Credit Bureau Center, LLC

    Due Process Violations

    The due process of law guarantees a right to be held to account only through the processes of an impartial court—something administrative tribunals violate every day.

    Scope of Authority / Nondelegation

    The structure of the Constitution allows only Congress to legislate, only the Executive to enforce laws, and only the Judiciary to decide cases. But the Administrative State evades the Constitution’s avenues of governance when executive agencies issue regulations without statutory authorization from Congress.

    Case Closed -

    Agencies: Federal Trade Commission

    View Case

SHARE THIS CASE

Enter your email address above to be notified whenever we post a new document to this case.